1. Why might Cornelia Nixon begin, rather than end, her
novel with the shooting? What difference does it make in how you read the
novel?
- We paid more attention to the novel and what went wrong in
the love affair.
- He never talked about the beating and assumed she knew
about the beating.
2. Does the author fully develop her characters? How would you
describe both Martha Jane Cairnes and Nicholas McComas? Are the two well-suited
to one another? What kind of character is Martha's brother Richard? Of the
primary characters, which do you most admire? Least admire?
- We thought they were a nice couple. He seemed to love her but when the brothers
beat him, he knew he couldn’t be part of the family.
3. Was the romance between Martha and Nick doomed? Given the
hostile environment and personalities and prejudices of those involved, was the
tragedy inevitable? Could the shooting have been avoided?
- At first we didn’t think so because it was under the radar
and she would have moved to one of his farms.
- Her brother made it doomed.
4. The novel indicates that the Civil War, while officially
over, had yet to end in places like Jarrettsville. Were you surprised by the
level of animosity in the wake of the war?
- No, taking rights away from blacks after Lincoln’s
assassination was not a good scene.
5. How are African Americans treated in Jarrettsville? Are
the freed slaves better off after the war than they were as slaves before the
war?
- They had “freedom” but were intimidated and treated badly.
- You could ask that same question now, like Michelle
Alexander wrote The New Jim Crow.
6. Did you detect the double-standard between men and women,
especially with regards to Martha and Isie?
- Of course.
7. At what point did you come to understand why Martha
shot Nick? Do you sympathizes with her? If so, how does an author go
about building sympathy for a murderer? If you have no sympathy for
Martha, why is that?
- Once she had the baby, it was so shameful with so much
social stigma
8. How thoroughly does Cornelia Nixon establish the novel's
19th-century setting? Does she bring to life both the era and its people?
If so, how does she accomplish this? If not, why not?
- Made us think about researching ancestry and we compared
what we knew about our background and who might make a good story.
9. Does the ending hold up? Were you surprised... or let
down by the way the novel ended?
10. Did you learn something new by reading this historical novel, perhaps something about the aftermath of the Civil War, the treatment of freed slaves, or the hostilities that continued after the war.
10. Did you learn something new by reading this historical novel, perhaps something about the aftermath of the Civil War, the treatment of freed slaves, or the hostilities that continued after the war.
- Even though people are still related, the animosity of
fighting on other sides of the war did not go away.